piclist 1997\06\05\035449a
>
Thread:
os/wars - a compilation - was Re: SoNoboby knows
www.piclist.org/techref/index.htm?key=sonoboby+knows
BY
:
mike@spamd-m-g.demon.co.uk
In message <3.0.1.16.19970604040259.41076e48.....
spamBeGonemail.wantree.com.au>
PICLIST@spam@
STOPspamMITVMA.MIT.EDU writes:
[ snips ]
>
> In my old days I had one design that used dual Z80B.
>
> Anyone considered their solution would employ more than one PIC, and
> as a result have any observations to offer ?
>
I considered it in a recent project, but ended up with a single PIC.
The application would have needed some transfer of data between the
2 PICs. It soon became apparent that they were going to spend more time
handing the data transfer than they were on their primary task.
So instead of 2 C84s, I went for a single C73.
Synergy does not apply to multi-processor systems. You always end up
with less than the sum of the parts because of the overhead of sharing
data.
Regards,
Mike Watson
<23985@d-m-g.demon.co.uk>
See also: www.piclist.org/techref/index.htm?key=sonoboby+knows
Reply
You must be a member of the
piclist mailing list
(not only a www.piclist.org member) to post to the
piclist. This form requires JavaScript and a browser/email client that can handle form mailto: posts.
month overview.
new search...